RadarTrek Intel — monthly score updates
We track 40+ tools so you don't have to. Score changes, new tools, and new guides — once a month, no spam.
Analytics comparison · 2026
Pirsch (73) and Fathom Analytics (72) are closely matched — this is one of the tightest Analytics comparisons in our database, with just 1 points separating them overall. The two are closest on Self-Hostable, where the gap is just 0 points. On pricing, Pirsch starts cheaper at $6/mo versus $14/mo. Use the radar chart and dimension table below to find which fits your specific priorities best.
Pirsch
Privacy-first analytics built for developers
73/100
Fathom Analytics
Simple, privacy-first alternative to Google Analytics
72/100
Radar comparison
Pirsch
73
Fathom Analytics
72
Ease of Use
Dashboard clarity, setup time, learning curve
Privacy
GDPR compliance, cookieless tracking, data residency
Product Analytics
Funnels, cohorts, session replays, events
Price/Value
Free tier, pricing per event or pageview
Integrations
Google Ads, Search Console, CRM, warehouse
Data Accuracy
Sampling, ad-blocker resistance, real-time reporting
Self-Hostable
Option to run on your own infrastructure
Overall Score
Pirsch
Pros
Cons
Fathom Analytics
Pros
Cons
Choose Pirsch if you value privacy most and have budget for $6/month or more. Choose Fathom Analytics if you value privacy most and have budget for $14/month or more. If neither dimension is a clear priority, Pirsch's higher overall score (73/100) makes it the safer default in the analytics category.
Based on our independent scoring across 7 dimensions, Pirsch scores 73/100 overall versus Fathom Analytics's 72/100 — a 1-point margin. Pirsch leads on Privacy in particular. That said, Fathom Analytics may still be the right choice if the dimensions where it scores higher match your specific priorities — the radar chart above shows the full profile side by side.
Pirsch starts cheaper at $6/month versus Fathom Analytics's $14/month. At higher usage tiers, the gap may narrow depending on each tool's scaling model. Check the official pricing pages for current plans — SaaS pricing changes frequently.
Pirsch and Fathom Analytics are closely matched across all dimensions. Pirsch has a slight edge on Price/Value — choose it if those align with your priorities. Fathom Analytics scores marginally better on Ease of Use — choose it if those are more relevant to your use case. The radar chart above shows the full comparison at a glance.
Switching between analytics tools is generally possible but involves migration effort: exporting your data or configuration from Pirsch, re-importing or reconfiguring in Fathom Analytics, and updating any API integrations or environment variables in your codebase. The effort scales with how deeply embedded the tool is in your stack. Test Fathom Analytics on a non-production project first before migrating.
Pirsch (73/100) is the better fit for teams who prioritise privacy — its strongest dimension — and who want a low-cost starting price. Fathom Analytics (72/100) is the better fit for teams who prioritise privacy and want a low-cost starting price. If both dimensions matter equally, the overall score winner (Pirsch) is the safer default choice.
Want this built for your business?
We design and build digital products — web apps, AI tools, SaaS platforms.