RadarTrek Intel — monthly score updates
We track 40+ tools so you don't have to. Score changes, new tools, and new guides — once a month, no spam.
Email Marketing comparison · 2026
Kit (ConvertKit) edges out ConstantContact in this Email Marketing comparison, scoring 80 against 73 across our seven scored dimensions. Kit (ConvertKit) has the edge on List Management (90 vs 75). The two are closest on Analytics, where the gap is just 0 points. On pricing, ConstantContact starts cheaper at $20/mo versus $25/mo. Use the radar chart and dimension table below to find which fits your specific priorities best.
ConstantContact
Reliable, beginner-friendly, but dated
73/100
Kit (ConvertKit)
Built for creators — tagging, sequences, commerce
80/100
Radar comparison
ConstantContact
73
Kit (ConvertKit)
80
Ease of Use
Onboarding, UI clarity, no-code builder
Deliverability
Inbox placement rates, SPF/DKIM setup
Automation
Workflows, sequences, behavioural triggers
Price/Value
Free tier generosity, paid tier pricing
Templates
Quality and variety of email templates
List Management
Segmentation, tagging, forms, opt-in flows
Analytics
Open rates, click maps, revenue attribution
Overall Score
ConstantContact
Pros
Cons
Kit (ConvertKit)
Pros
Cons
Choose ConstantContact if you value deliverability most and have budget for $20/month or more. Choose Kit (ConvertKit) if you value list management most and have budget for $25/month or more. If neither dimension is a clear priority, Kit (ConvertKit)'s higher overall score (80/100) makes it the safer default in the email marketing category.
Based on our independent scoring across 7 dimensions, Kit (ConvertKit) scores 80/100 overall versus ConstantContact's 73/100 — a 7-point margin. Kit (ConvertKit) leads on Deliverability in particular. That said, ConstantContact may still be the right choice if the dimensions where it scores higher match your specific priorities — the radar chart above shows the full profile side by side.
ConstantContact starts cheaper at $20/month versus Kit (ConvertKit)'s $25/month. At higher usage tiers, the gap may narrow depending on each tool's scaling model. Check the official pricing pages for current plans — SaaS pricing changes frequently.
ConstantContact scores higher on Templates — 80/100 versus 70/100 for Kit (ConvertKit). If templates is your primary decision criterion, ConstantContact is the stronger choice in this head-to-head.
Switching between email marketing tools is generally possible but involves migration effort: exporting your data or configuration from ConstantContact, re-importing or reconfiguring in Kit (ConvertKit), and updating any API integrations or environment variables in your codebase. The effort scales with how deeply embedded the tool is in your stack. Test Kit (ConvertKit) on a non-production project first before migrating.
ConstantContact (73/100) is the better fit for teams who prioritise deliverability — its strongest dimension — and who want a low-cost starting price. Kit (ConvertKit) (80/100) is the better fit for teams who prioritise list management and want a free entry point. If both dimensions matter equally, the overall score winner (Kit (ConvertKit)) is the safer default choice.
Want this built for your business?
We design and build digital products — web apps, AI tools, SaaS platforms.