RadarTrek Intel — monthly score updates
We track 40+ tools so you don't have to. Score changes, new tools, and new guides — once a month, no spam.
Web Hosting comparison · 2026
WP Engine (85) and Cloudways (86) are closely matched — this is one of the tightest Web Hosting comparisons in our database, with just 1 points separating them overall. WP Engine leads on Support (92 vs 80), while Cloudways has the edge on Price / Value (76 vs 60). The two are closest on Performance, where the gap is just 1 points. On pricing, Cloudways starts cheaper at $14/mo versus $20/mo. WP Engine is WordPress-only by design, with Git-push deploys and built-in staging environments, and it enforces a published list of disallowed plugins for performance and security reasons — a constraint, not a bug, but one to check against your plugin list before migrating. Cloudways doesn't run its own data centers — it's a management layer on top of DigitalOcean, AWS, GCP, Linode, and Vultr, so you get hourly pay-as-you-go billing and the ability to switch underlying cloud providers without migrating your stack. Use the radar chart and dimension table below to find which fits your specific priorities best.
WP Engine
Managed WordPress hosting for serious sites
85/100
Cloudways
Managed cloud hosting on AWS, GCP, DigitalOcean
86/100
Radar comparison
WP Engine
85
Cloudways
86
Performance
Load speed and TTFB from independent benchmarks
Uptime
Reliability measured over 12 months
Price / Value
Features and resources per dollar spent
Support
Response time and quality of customer support
Scalability
Ease of upgrading resources and plans
Security
SSL, backups, malware protection, firewalls
Ease of Use
Control panel and onboarding experience
Overall Score
WP Engine
Pros
Cons
Cloudways
Pros
Cons
Choose WP Engine if you value uptime most and have budget for $20/month or more. Choose Cloudways if you value uptime most and have budget for $14/month or more. If neither dimension is a clear priority, Cloudways's higher overall score (86/100) makes it the safer default in the web hosting category.
Based on our independent scoring across 7 dimensions, Cloudways scores 86/100 overall versus WP Engine's 85/100 — a 1-point margin. Cloudways leads on Uptime in particular. That said, WP Engine may still be the right choice if the dimensions where it scores higher match your specific priorities — the radar chart above shows the full profile side by side.
Cloudways starts cheaper at $14/month versus WP Engine's $20/month. At higher usage tiers, the gap may narrow depending on each tool's scaling model. Check the official pricing pages for current plans — SaaS pricing changes frequently.
WP Engine scores higher on Support — 92/100 versus 80/100 for Cloudways. If support is your primary decision criterion, WP Engine is the stronger choice in this head-to-head.
Switching between web hosting tools is generally possible but involves migration effort: exporting your data or configuration from WP Engine, re-importing or reconfiguring in Cloudways, and updating any API integrations or environment variables in your codebase. The effort scales with how deeply embedded the tool is in your stack. Test Cloudways on a non-production project first before migrating.
WP Engine (85/100) is the better fit for teams who prioritise uptime — its strongest dimension — and who want a low-cost starting price. Cloudways (86/100) is the better fit for teams who prioritise uptime and want a low-cost starting price. If both dimensions matter equally, the overall score winner (Cloudways) is the safer default choice.
Need a website built on this stack?
We build Next.js + Supabase + Vercel products. Ready to launch in weeks, not months.