RadarTrek Intel — monthly score updates
We track 40+ tools so you don't have to. Score changes, new tools, and new guides — once a month, no spam.
Analytics comparison · 2026
Matomo edges out Fathom Analytics in this Analytics comparison, scoring 78 against 72 across our seven scored dimensions. Fathom Analytics leads on Ease of Use (90 vs 62), while Matomo has the edge on Self-Hostable (100 vs 0). The two are closest on Privacy, where the gap is just 2 points. On pricing, Fathom Analytics starts cheaper at $14/mo versus $23/mo. Use the radar chart and dimension table below to find which fits your specific priorities best.
Fathom Analytics
Simple, privacy-first alternative to Google Analytics
72/100
Matomo
Open-source, self-hosted, GDPR-compliant alternative
78/100
Radar comparison
Fathom Analytics
72
Matomo
78
Ease of Use
Dashboard clarity, setup time, learning curve
Privacy
GDPR compliance, cookieless tracking, data residency
Product Analytics
Funnels, cohorts, session replays, events
Price/Value
Free tier, pricing per event or pageview
Integrations
Google Ads, Search Console, CRM, warehouse
Data Accuracy
Sampling, ad-blocker resistance, real-time reporting
Self-Hostable
Option to run on your own infrastructure
Overall Score
Fathom Analytics
Pros
Cons
Matomo
Pros
Cons
Choose Fathom Analytics if you value privacy most and have budget for $14/month or more. Choose Matomo if you value self-hostable most and have budget for $23/month or more. If neither dimension is a clear priority, Matomo's higher overall score (78/100) makes it the safer default in the analytics category.
Based on our independent scoring across 7 dimensions, Matomo scores 78/100 overall versus Fathom Analytics's 72/100 — a 6-point margin. Matomo leads on Privacy in particular. That said, Fathom Analytics may still be the right choice if the dimensions where it scores higher match your specific priorities — the radar chart above shows the full profile side by side.
Fathom Analytics starts cheaper at $14/month versus Matomo's $23/month. At higher usage tiers, the gap may narrow depending on each tool's scaling model. Check the official pricing pages for current plans — SaaS pricing changes frequently.
Fathom Analytics scores higher on Ease of Use — 90/100 versus 62/100 for Matomo. If ease of use is your primary decision criterion, Fathom Analytics is the stronger choice in this head-to-head.
Switching between analytics tools is generally possible but involves migration effort: exporting your data or configuration from Fathom Analytics, re-importing or reconfiguring in Matomo, and updating any API integrations or environment variables in your codebase. The effort scales with how deeply embedded the tool is in your stack. Test Matomo on a non-production project first before migrating.
Fathom Analytics (72/100) is the better fit for teams who prioritise privacy — its strongest dimension — and who want a low-cost starting price. Matomo (78/100) is the better fit for teams who prioritise self-hostable and want a free entry point. If both dimensions matter equally, the overall score winner (Matomo) is the safer default choice.
Want this built for your business?
We design and build digital products — web apps, AI tools, SaaS platforms.