RadarTrek
Lesson 01 / 8·7 minFree

Why Evals Matter

The cost of untested AI features — and what a real eval pipeline looks like

Shipping an AI feature without evals is like deploying code without tests and hoping nothing breaks. The difference is that AI failures are subtle — the model still returns a response, just a worse one. A new model version, a prompt change, or a context window shift can degrade quality silently. Evals are the tests that catch these regressions before users report them.

What can go wrong without evals

  • Prompt regressions after model updatesA new Claude or GPT version changes how it interprets instructions. Your prompts that worked last month produce subtly different output now. Without evals, you find out from user complaints.
  • Context poisoningRetrieved chunks in RAG pipelines vary by query. Adding more documents to the knowledge base can cause the model to ignore the correct answer. You would never know without a test set.
  • Tone and format driftA "professional" system prompt that produced formal emails now produces casual ones after you tweaked the instructions for something else. Evals catch format changes.
  • Latency and cost regressionsA prompt change that improves quality can triple token count. Without measuring, you get a surprise bill at end of month.

The eval pipeline

  • Test set — a collection of inputs with expected outputsYour golden dataset: real user queries (or representative ones) with human-validated expected responses. The foundation of every eval system.
  • Runner — code that executes your AI feature on the test setCalls your actual production code (not a simplified version) with each test input. Captures the output for scoring.
  • Scorer — measures quality of each outputExact match for structured outputs. LLM-as-judge for quality and correctness. Regex/contains checks for format and required content.
  • Aggregator — summarises results and detects regressionsComputes pass rate, average score, and per-category breakdowns. Compares against a baseline. Flags when quality drops below threshold.
  • CI integration — runs on every code changeEvals run in CI alongside your tests. A drop in eval score blocks the PR just like a failing test.
🎯

Try this

Write a simple manual eval: take an AI feature you have already built (or the simplest possible: a summarisation prompt). Create a text file with 5 test cases — each with an input and a hand-written description of what a good response looks like. Run your AI feature on all 5 inputs manually, then score each output against your expected description (pass/fail, no code yet). This is the conceptual foundation of everything that follows.

RadarTrek Intel — monthly score updates

We track 40+ tools so you don't have to. Score changes, new tools, and new guides — once a month, no spam.