Backblaze B2 vs Wasabi

Backblaze B2 and Wasabi score identically in our overall RadarTrek assessment — both earn 86/100 across 6 scored dimensions. This is one of the closest object storage comparisons in our database. The right choice depends entirely on which specific dimension matters most to your use case — use the dimension breakdown above to compare scores on your priority criterion.

Backblaze B2 is cheaper at the entry level — it offers a permanent free tier, while Wasabi starts at $6.99/month. If budget is the primary constraint, Backblaze B2 is the lower-risk starting point. Wasabi's paid features may justify the cost — compare the plan limits before committing.

Backblaze B2 and Wasabi are closely matched across all dimensions. Backblaze B2 has a slight edge on Price / Value — choose it if those align with your priorities. Wasabi scores marginally better on Egress Cost — choose it if those are more relevant to your use case. The radar chart above shows the full comparison at a glance.

Switching between object storage tools is generally possible but involves migration effort: exporting your data or configuration from Backblaze B2, re-importing or reconfiguring in Wasabi, and updating any API integrations or environment variables in your codebase. The effort scales with how deeply embedded the tool is in your stack. Test Wasabi on a non-production project first before migrating.

Backblaze B2 (86/100) is the better fit for teams who prioritise price / value — its strongest dimension — and who want a free entry point. Wasabi (86/100) is the better fit for teams who prioritise egress cost and want a low-cost starting price. If both dimensions matter equally, the overall score winner (either tool) is the safer default choice.