RadarTrek Intel — monthly score updates
We track 40+ tools so you don't have to. Score changes, new tools, and new guides — once a month, no spam.
Object Storage comparison · 2026
DigitalOcean Spaces (82) and Amazon S3 (81) are closely matched — this is one of the tightest Object Storage comparisons in our database, with just 1 points separating them overall. DigitalOcean Spaces leads on Egress Cost (72 vs 40), while Amazon S3 has the edge on Ecosystem (98 vs 75). The two are closest on Developer UX, where the gap is just 3 points. On pricing, Amazon S3 starts cheaper at $0/mo versus $5/mo. Use the radar chart and dimension table below to find which fits your specific priorities best.
DigitalOcean Spaces
Simple S3-compatible storage with a built-in CDN
82/100
Amazon S3
The original and most widely adopted object store
81/100
Radar comparison
DigitalOcean Spaces
82
Amazon S3
81
Durability
Data redundancy guarantees and SLA-backed durability.
Price / Value
Storage cost per GB and egress fees.
Performance
Upload/download throughput and latency.
Developer UX
SDK quality, S3 API compatibility, and setup speed.
Egress Cost
Cost of transferring data out — often the hidden expense.
Ecosystem
CDN integration, multi-region support, and tooling.
Overall Score
Based on our independent scoring across 6 dimensions, DigitalOcean Spaces scores 82/100 overall versus Amazon S3's 81/100 — a 1-point margin. DigitalOcean Spaces leads on Developer UX in particular. That said, Amazon S3 may still be the right choice if the dimensions where it scores higher match your specific priorities — the radar chart above shows the full profile side by side.
Amazon S3 is cheaper at the entry level — it offers a permanent free tier, while DigitalOcean Spaces starts at $5/month. If budget is the primary constraint, Amazon S3 is the lower-risk starting point. DigitalOcean Spaces's paid features may justify the cost — compare the plan limits before committing.
DigitalOcean Spaces scores higher on Egress Cost — 72/100 versus 40/100 for Amazon S3. If egress cost is your primary decision criterion, DigitalOcean Spaces is the stronger choice in this head-to-head.
Switching between object storage tools is generally possible but involves migration effort: exporting your data or configuration from DigitalOcean Spaces, re-importing or reconfiguring in Amazon S3, and updating any API integrations or environment variables in your codebase. The effort scales with how deeply embedded the tool is in your stack. Test Amazon S3 on a non-production project first before migrating.
DigitalOcean Spaces (82/100) is the better fit for teams who prioritise developer ux — its strongest dimension — and who want a low-cost starting price. Amazon S3 (81/100) is the better fit for teams who prioritise durability and want a free entry point. If both dimensions matter equally, the overall score winner (DigitalOcean Spaces) is the safer default choice.
Want this built for your business?
We design and build digital products — web apps, AI tools, SaaS platforms.