RadarTrek Intel — monthly score updates
We track 40+ tools so you don't have to. Score changes, new tools, and new guides — once a month, no spam.
Object Storage comparison · 2026
Wasabi (86) and Amazon S3 (81) are closely matched — this is one of the tightest Object Storage comparisons in our database, with just 5 points separating them overall. Wasabi leads on Egress Cost (95 vs 40), while Amazon S3 has the edge on Ecosystem (98 vs 65). The two are closest on Developer UX, where the gap is just 7 points. On pricing, Amazon S3 starts cheaper at $0/mo versus $6.99/mo. Use the radar chart and dimension table below to find which fits your specific priorities best.
Wasabi
Flat-rate storage pricing with no egress or API fees
86/100
Amazon S3
The original and most widely adopted object store
81/100
Radar comparison
Wasabi
86
Amazon S3
81
Durability
Data redundancy guarantees and SLA-backed durability.
Price / Value
Storage cost per GB and egress fees.
Performance
Upload/download throughput and latency.
Developer UX
SDK quality, S3 API compatibility, and setup speed.
Egress Cost
Cost of transferring data out — often the hidden expense.
Ecosystem
CDN integration, multi-region support, and tooling.
Overall Score
Based on our independent scoring across 6 dimensions, Wasabi scores 86/100 overall versus Amazon S3's 81/100 — a 5-point margin. Wasabi leads on Egress Cost in particular. That said, Amazon S3 may still be the right choice if the dimensions where it scores higher match your specific priorities — the radar chart above shows the full profile side by side.
Amazon S3 is cheaper at the entry level — it offers a permanent free tier, while Wasabi starts at $6.99/month. If budget is the primary constraint, Amazon S3 is the lower-risk starting point. Wasabi's paid features may justify the cost — compare the plan limits before committing.
Wasabi scores higher on Egress Cost — 95/100 versus 40/100 for Amazon S3. If egress cost is your primary decision criterion, Wasabi is the stronger choice in this head-to-head.
Switching between object storage tools is generally possible but involves migration effort: exporting your data or configuration from Wasabi, re-importing or reconfiguring in Amazon S3, and updating any API integrations or environment variables in your codebase. The effort scales with how deeply embedded the tool is in your stack. Test Amazon S3 on a non-production project first before migrating.
Wasabi (86/100) is the better fit for teams who prioritise egress cost — its strongest dimension — and who want a low-cost starting price. Amazon S3 (81/100) is the better fit for teams who prioritise durability and want a free entry point. If both dimensions matter equally, the overall score winner (Wasabi) is the safer default choice.
Want this built for your business?
We design and build digital products — web apps, AI tools, SaaS platforms.