Wasabi vs Backblaze B2

Wasabi and Backblaze B2 score identically in our overall RadarTrek assessment — both earn 86/100 across 6 scored dimensions. This is one of the closest object storage comparisons in our database. The right choice depends entirely on which specific dimension matters most to your use case — use the dimension breakdown above to compare scores on your priority criterion.

Backblaze B2 is cheaper at the entry level — it offers a permanent free tier, while Wasabi starts at $6.99/month. If budget is the primary constraint, Backblaze B2 is the lower-risk starting point. Wasabi's paid features may justify the cost — compare the plan limits before committing.

Wasabi and Backblaze B2 are closely matched across all dimensions. Wasabi has a slight edge on Egress Cost — choose it if those align with your priorities. Backblaze B2 scores marginally better on Price / Value — choose it if those are more relevant to your use case. The radar chart above shows the full comparison at a glance.

Switching between object storage tools is generally possible but involves migration effort: exporting your data or configuration from Wasabi, re-importing or reconfiguring in Backblaze B2, and updating any API integrations or environment variables in your codebase. The effort scales with how deeply embedded the tool is in your stack. Test Backblaze B2 on a non-production project first before migrating.

Wasabi (86/100) is the better fit for teams who prioritise egress cost — its strongest dimension — and who want a low-cost starting price. Backblaze B2 (86/100) is the better fit for teams who prioritise price / value and want a free entry point. If both dimensions matter equally, the overall score winner (either tool) is the safer default choice.