RadarTrek Intel — monthly score updates
We track 40+ tools so you don't have to. Score changes, new tools, and new guides — once a month, no spam.
Object Storage comparison · 2026
Wasabi (86) and DigitalOcean Spaces (82) are closely matched — this is one of the tightest Object Storage comparisons in our database, with just 4 points separating them overall. Wasabi leads on Egress Cost (95 vs 72). The two are closest on Performance, where the gap is just 2 points. On pricing, DigitalOcean Spaces starts cheaper at $5/mo versus $6.99/mo. Use the radar chart and dimension table below to find which fits your specific priorities best.
Wasabi
Flat-rate storage pricing with no egress or API fees
86/100
DigitalOcean Spaces
Simple S3-compatible storage with a built-in CDN
82/100
Radar comparison
Wasabi
86
DigitalOcean Spaces
82
Durability
Data redundancy guarantees and SLA-backed durability.
Price / Value
Storage cost per GB and egress fees.
Performance
Upload/download throughput and latency.
Developer UX
SDK quality, S3 API compatibility, and setup speed.
Egress Cost
Cost of transferring data out — often the hidden expense.
Ecosystem
CDN integration, multi-region support, and tooling.
Overall Score
Based on our independent scoring across 6 dimensions, Wasabi scores 86/100 overall versus DigitalOcean Spaces's 82/100 — a 4-point margin. Wasabi leads on Egress Cost in particular. That said, DigitalOcean Spaces may still be the right choice if the dimensions where it scores higher match your specific priorities — the radar chart above shows the full profile side by side.
DigitalOcean Spaces starts cheaper at $5/month versus Wasabi's $6.99/month. At higher usage tiers, the gap may narrow depending on each tool's scaling model. Check the official pricing pages for current plans — SaaS pricing changes frequently.
Wasabi scores higher on Egress Cost — 95/100 versus 72/100 for DigitalOcean Spaces. If egress cost is your primary decision criterion, Wasabi is the stronger choice in this head-to-head.
Switching between object storage tools is generally possible but involves migration effort: exporting your data or configuration from Wasabi, re-importing or reconfiguring in DigitalOcean Spaces, and updating any API integrations or environment variables in your codebase. The effort scales with how deeply embedded the tool is in your stack. Test DigitalOcean Spaces on a non-production project first before migrating.
Wasabi (86/100) is the better fit for teams who prioritise egress cost — its strongest dimension — and who want a low-cost starting price. DigitalOcean Spaces (82/100) is the better fit for teams who prioritise developer ux and want a low-cost starting price. If both dimensions matter equally, the overall score winner (Wasabi) is the safer default choice.
Want this built for your business?
We design and build digital products — web apps, AI tools, SaaS platforms.