RadarTrek Intel — monthly score updates
We track 40+ tools so you don't have to. Score changes, new tools, and new guides — once a month, no spam.
Object Storage comparison · 2026
Wasabi (86) and Cloudflare R2 (91) are closely matched — this is one of the tightest Object Storage comparisons in our database, with just 5 points separating them overall. Cloudflare R2 has the edge on Ecosystem (82 vs 65). The two are closest on Durability, where the gap is just 2 points. On pricing, Cloudflare R2 starts cheaper at $0/mo versus $6.99/mo. Use the radar chart and dimension table below to find which fits your specific priorities best.
Wasabi
Flat-rate storage pricing with no egress or API fees
86/100
Cloudflare R2
S3-compatible storage with zero egress fees
91/100
Radar comparison
Wasabi
86
Cloudflare R2
91
Durability
Data redundancy guarantees and SLA-backed durability.
Price / Value
Storage cost per GB and egress fees.
Performance
Upload/download throughput and latency.
Developer UX
SDK quality, S3 API compatibility, and setup speed.
Egress Cost
Cost of transferring data out — often the hidden expense.
Ecosystem
CDN integration, multi-region support, and tooling.
Overall Score
Based on our independent scoring across 6 dimensions, Cloudflare R2 scores 91/100 overall versus Wasabi's 86/100 — a 5-point margin. Cloudflare R2 leads on Egress Cost in particular. That said, Wasabi may still be the right choice if the dimensions where it scores higher match your specific priorities — the radar chart above shows the full profile side by side.
Cloudflare R2 is cheaper at the entry level — it offers a permanent free tier, while Wasabi starts at $6.99/month. If budget is the primary constraint, Cloudflare R2 is the lower-risk starting point. Wasabi's paid features may justify the cost — compare the plan limits before committing.
Cloudflare R2 scores higher on Ecosystem — 82/100 versus 65/100 for Wasabi. If ecosystem is your primary decision criterion, Cloudflare R2 is the stronger choice in this head-to-head.
Switching between object storage tools is generally possible but involves migration effort: exporting your data or configuration from Wasabi, re-importing or reconfiguring in Cloudflare R2, and updating any API integrations or environment variables in your codebase. The effort scales with how deeply embedded the tool is in your stack. Test Cloudflare R2 on a non-production project first before migrating.
Wasabi (86/100) is the better fit for teams who prioritise egress cost — its strongest dimension — and who want a low-cost starting price. Cloudflare R2 (91/100) is the better fit for teams who prioritise egress cost and want a free entry point. If both dimensions matter equally, the overall score winner (Cloudflare R2) is the safer default choice.
Want this built for your business?
We design and build digital products — web apps, AI tools, SaaS platforms.